USPTO serial 87235438
UVIÑA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UVIÑA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sausser
BRENT D. SAUSSER THE LAW FIRM OF SAUSSER AND SPURR, LLC2 ROSEDALE DRCHARLESTON, SC 29407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | (Based on Intent to Use) Aerated water; Aloe vera drinks; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; Essences for the preparation of mineral waters; Fruit juice; Fruit nectars; Grape must; Isotonic beverages; Lemonades; Milk of almonds for beverage; Mineral water; Must; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; Non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; Powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Smoothies; Sorbets in the nature of beverages; Soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; Syrups for lemonade; Syrups for beverages; Table waters; Tomato juice; Vegetable juices; Water beverages; Whey beverages(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Aerated water; Aloe vera drinks; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; Essences for the preparation of mineral waters; Fruit juice; Fruit nectars; Grape must; Isotonic beverages; Lemonades; Milk of almonds for beverage; Mineral water; Must; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; Non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; Powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Smoothies; Sorbets in the nature of beverages; Soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; Syrups for lemonade; Syrups for beverages; Table waters; Tomato juice; Vegetable juices; Water beverages; Whey beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |