Drawing for MAXUM

USPTO serial 87235617

MAXUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. MacMillan

RICHARD S. MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC720 WATER STREETONE MARITIME PLAZA, FIFTH FLOORTOLEDO, OH 43604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007motor starters; alternators; water pumps for land vehicles; fuel pumps for land vehicles; oil pumps for land vehicles; air conditioner compressors; parts of electronic ignitions, namely, ignition coils for vehicles; vehicle radiator parts, namely, water outlets for vehicle cooling systemsACTIVE—
009automotive sensors for sensing the actuation and operation of automotive apparatus and equipment; thermostatsACTIVE—
012parts for vehicles, namely, control arms; engine and transmission motor mounts especially adapted for use in motor vehicles; steering and suspension system parts, namely, control arms, upper and lower ball joints, outer and inner tie rods ends, drag links, idler arms, pitman arms, bushings; vehicle wheel hubs; shock absorbers for vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance