Drawing for CONDOMS TO GO

USPTO serial 87235852

CONDOMS TO GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONDOMS TO GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary P. Krupkin

GARY P. KRUPKIN GARY P. KRUPKIN, ESQ.1116 COMMERCE DRIVERICHARDSON, TX 75081UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring vibrators, marital aids, lotions, lubricants, lingerie, games, herbal pills, DVD's, bachelor and bachelorette party goods, shoes, and fetish itemsACTIVEMar 15, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2018PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 22, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 26, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 21, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance