USPTO serial 87236464
DRAGONFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2020
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DRAGONFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey C. Friends
Stacey C. Friends MorseCityPoint, 480 Totten Pond Road4th floorWaltham, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware sold as a unit with software, comprising Radio-frequency identification (RFID) hardware, namely, antennas, readers, adapters, tablets, cameras, cables and printers, for use in processing fruit, vegetable, and plant imagery for use in the control and management of agricultural crops, food traceability, agricultural crop performance, agricultural crop diseases and agricultural crop infections in the fields of agriculture and food safety to meet standards and regulatory compliance; computer software for computer security and prevention of computer risks, namely, computer software for organizing, coordinating, automating, managing and monitoring a disaster recovery plan, for analyzing the risks and effects of an interruption of business, and for developing strategies for reducing exposure to and recovering from an interruption of business; computer software for control and management of agricultural crops, food traceability and agricultural crop performance in the field of food safety to meet standards and regulatory compliance; computer software for control and management of agricultural crop diseases and agricultural crop infections in the field of agriculture | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design services in the fields of agriculture and food safety; computer hardware and software design in the fields of agriculture and food safety; software creation in the fields of agriculture and food safety; software engineering in the fields of agriculture and food safety; computer software development in the fields of agriculture and food safety; computer software advisory services in the fields of agriculture and food safety; computer software consultancy in the fields of agriculture and food safety; software as a service (SAAS) providing software for computer security and prevention of computer risks in the fields of agriculture and food safety; cloud computing providing software for computer security and prevention of computer risks in the fields of agriculture and food safety; software as a service (SAAS) providing software for crop management, management of food safety, traceability and production performance; cloud computing providing software for crop management, management of food safety, traceability and production performance; software as a service (SAAS) providing software for disease infection control and management; cloud computing providing software for disease infection control and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dragonfly Information Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DRAGONFLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |