USPTO serial 87237736
KLEENEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2018
- Examiner
- BHUPATHI, TARA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with KLEENEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Blaine, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD I. SOBELMAN
HOWARD I. SOBELMAN Snell & Wilmer LLPOne East Washington StreetSuite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Curtains | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| May 24, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| May 15, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 25, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 25, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | โ |
| May 15, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Mar 22, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Mar 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Mar 6, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | โ |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Nov 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Nov 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |