USPTO serial 87238584
THINK THINK COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2022
- Examiner
- CERDA, VICTOR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with THINK THINK COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nichole Baer
Nichole Baer APPEL, YOST & ZEE LLP33 N DUKE STREETLANCASTER, PA 17602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients; Brand evaluation services; Brand imagery consulting services; Brand positioning services; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals; Business consulting services, namely, providing assistance in development of business strategies and creative ideation; Business management consultancy limited to the development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Development of marketing strategies, concepts and tactics, namely, audience development, brand awareness, customer relations, online community building and digital word of mouth communications; Marketing and branding services, namely, providing customized communication programs to obtain consumer insights and develop branding strategies; On-line customer-based social media brand marketing services; Social media strategy and marketing consultancy focusing on helping clients create and extend their product and brand strategies by building virally engaging marketing solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online non-downloadable articles, guidelines, standards, and supporting materials in the field of Design Thinking, Product Design, Strategy, Business Processes, Marketing, and Branding; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, classes, lectures, and 1:1 instruction in the fields of Design Thinking, Product Design, Strategy, Business Processes, Marketing, and Branding and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, classes, lectures, and 1:1 instruction in the field of Design Thinking, Product Design, Strategy, Business Processes, Marketing, and Branding; Workshops and seminars in the field of Design Thinking, Product Design, Strategy, Business Processes, Marketing, and Branding | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of the design of mobile, smartphone, and tablet applications; Custom design and development of mobile, smartphone, and tablet applications; Design and development of mobile, smartphone, and tablet applications; Design of information graphics and data visualization materials; Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of mobile, smartphone, and tablet applications; Designing mobile, smartphone, and tablet applications; Software development and product development in the field of banking, finance, big data, business intelligence and analytics, commercial design and construction, digital payment, electronics, energy, healthcare, higher education, human resources, insurance, media, non-profit, real estate, software, retail, telecommunications, and travel and leisure not to include SAAS; Website design and development for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Think Brownstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Think Brownstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Think Brownstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THINK THINK COMPANY
- Prosecution event R.PR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2022 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |