USPTO serial 87238606
ATMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP1225 17TH ST STE 2600DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Technical backpacks for backpacking and load carrying; technical backpacks compatible with personal hydration systems, sold empty, for backpacking and load carrying | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |