USPTO serial 87240501
CAKE BROWSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAKE BROWSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH JORDAN, UT
South Jordan, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
John C. Stringham WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | network access server operating software for connecting computers to the internet and the intranet; software for accessing, organizing, and managing multiple software applications, sold as an integral component of computer operating system and graphical user interface software; Computer software for accessing, sharing and communicating information over computer networks, and for conducting and executing business transactions using computer networks, not including the restaurant management and operating field; computer software used to secure a computer from pop-up advertising; network access server operating software for connecting mobile communication devices to the Internet and intranets; computer software for use in the transfer of information and the conduct of commercial transactions across local, national and world-wide information networks; computer software for the search for and transfer of information across global computer communications networks, and for the execution of business transactions using global computer communications networks; computer software for enabling users to access the internet for communications purposes; computer software for enabling users to access to computers, computer software, databases, communications services, and electronic communications networks; computer software for networking, controlling communications between computers and database management; computer software for creating and managing systems for exchanging information; network server for managing network information; computer software, namely, a suite of integrated server software that enables organizations, not including the restaurant management and operating field, to communicate, access and share information over computer networks; Computer software for accessing and transmitting data and content among consumer electronics devices and displays; computer operating software; computer software for providing access to the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing searchable on-line computer databases in the field of business, professional business information, and trade-related information | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | computer and electronic commercial services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Telecommunications services, namely, providing multiple-user access to global computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 039 | Providing searchable on-line computer databases in the field of travel | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Providing searchable on-line computer databases in the field of entertainment news, entertainment industry, entertainment, and other information on a wide variety of topics of general interest in the nature of entertainment; providing searchable on-line computer databases in the field of news in the nature of current event reporting | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable middleware for providing an interface between web browser and legacy systems; providing information on a wide variety of topics in the field of technology and software development via electronic communications networks and providing internet search engines for obtaining data via electronic communications networks; providing data bases of information on a wide variety of topics in the field of technology and software development on a global computer network | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAKE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lips Labs Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CAKE BROWSER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |