Drawing for LIBERTY COMMUNITIES

USPTO serial 87240574

LIBERTY COMMUNITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIBERTY COMMUNITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rodgers Lunsford III

J. RODGERS LUNSFORD III SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.SUITE 3100 - PROMENADEATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Real estate services, namely, real estate site selection, and real estate development; land development services, namely, planning and laying out of residential and/or commercial communities; construction services, namely, laying out of residential communitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 18, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance