Drawing for ADCHAIN

USPTO serial 87242946

ADCHAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADCHAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-1730UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for enabling users to electronically create, exchange, store, send, receive, accept and transmit digital tokens based on the blockchain technology; Computer application software used to create, manage, analyze and verify digital advertising campaigns and associated data transactions utilizing blockchain-based platforms, cryptocurrency and instant messaging; Computer software for encryption; Software for enterprise blockchain development and implementation, execution and management of secure data transactions, management of data escrow, and provisioning of shared and distributed ledgers; Computer software platforms for accessing, authenticating, verifying, processing, monitoring, securing, clearing, settling, recording and reporting enterprise blockchain financial transactions; Computer software platforms for hosting, running, monitoring and troubleshooting enterprise blockchains for providing a financial exchange for trading cryptocurrency; Application programming interface (api) software for development, testing, and integration of blockchain software applications to shared and distributed ledgersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 15, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 15, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance