USPTO serial 87243105
NIAGARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIAGARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua A. Schaul
JOSHUA A SCHAUL SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metal drawing machines; Metal forming machines; Metal working machines; Bending machines; Continuous metal casting machines; Diamond-pointed metal-cutting tools; Machine tools for forming, riveting, swaging, and flaring of metal and plastics; Machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; Milling machines and grinding machines for the treatment of ceramics and metal; Polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramics and plastics; Press dies for metal forming; Printing machines for use on sheet metal; Rolling machines for rolling metals; Rolling mills; Slotting machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |