Drawing for MICRO CHEF

USPTO serial 87244007

MICRO CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6228242Status 700Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2020
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 700: Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six.

Need help with MICRO CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $325

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel R. Feldman

Joel R. Feldman Greenberg Traurig, LLP3333 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 2500Atlanta, GA 30305United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cookware, namely, roasting pans; bakeware; pots; pans; sauté and sauce pans; frying pans; skillets; casserole dishesACTIVEOct 10, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 24, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2025REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 12, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 22, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2020SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 18, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 16, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 16, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 3, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 28, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 14, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance