Drawing for MICROCHEF

USPTO serial 87244015

MICROCHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROCHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Noam J. Kritzer

Noam J. Kritzer Bakos & Kritzer147 Columbia TurnpikeSuite 102Florham Park, NJ 07932

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric cooking pots; Electric Dutch ovens; Electric food steamers; Electric pressure cookers; Electric rice cooker; Electric saucepans; Electric slow cookers; electric rice steamers; Air fryers; Electric fryersACTIVE—
008Kitchen hand tools, namely, kitchen knives, pairing knives, apple corers, hand-operated slicers, vegetable corers, vegetable slicersACTIVE—
011Electric cooking pots; Electric Dutch ovens; Electric food steamers; Electric pressure cookers; Electric rice cooker; Electric saucepans; Electric slow cookers; electric rice steamers; Air fryers; Electric fryersACTIVE—
021cookware, namely, roasting pans, steamers; bakeware; kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens, pouring and straining spouts, colanders; pots; pans; cookware, namely, steamers; sauté and sauce pans; frying pans; skillets; cookie sheets; pie pans; baking pans; stock pots; dutch ovens; double boilers; non-electric pressure cookers; casserole dishesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance