Drawing for JAEGER-OXYDISC

USPTO serial 87245411

JAEGER-OXYDISC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAEGER-OXYDISC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELLEN REILLY

ELLEN REILLY REILLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FIRM1888 N SHERMAN STREETSUITE 200DENVER, CO 80203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Diffusers used in machines for wastewater treatment in wastewater treatment facilities; Diffusers used in machines for wastewater and clearwater treatment; Apparatus for aerating water in wastewater treatment facilitiesACTIVEMay 31, 2016
011Diffusers for aeration systems for wastewater treatment in wastewater treatment facilities and lake aeration; Diffusers for wastewater treatment in wastewater treatment facilitiesACTIVEMay 31, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 3, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 3, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 1, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 21, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 4, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 4, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 2, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 4, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 9, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance