Drawing for FLITE

USPTO serial 87245914

FLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Van Hoosear

JEFFREY VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE MARTENS2040 MAIN STREET14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020executive office furniture, namely, adjustable height executive chairs which rotate and tilt and have armrests, for desks and conference room tables sold through executive office furniture dealers, interior designers, and architectsACTIVEDec 28, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 3, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance