Drawing for PEATALK

USPTO serial 87245995

PEATALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEATALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luke Brean

LUKE BREAN BREANLAW, LLCP.O. BOX 4120, ECM #72065PORTLAND, OR 97208UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for administration of computer networks; Network routers; Wireless routersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance