USPTO serial 87247815
VERTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath towels; Bath gloves; Bath linen; Bath mitts; Bath sheets; Beach towels; Bed linen; Bed linen and table linen; Bed and table linen; Towel sets; Towel sheet; Towels; Towels; Towels for use in salons and barber shops; Towels made of textile materials; Towels of textile; Turkish towel; Children's towels; Compressed towels; Cotton towels; Face towels; Face towels of textile; Face towels of textiles; Football towels; Golf towels; Hand towels; Hand towels of textile; Hand-towels made of textile fabrics; Hooded towels; Kitchen towels; Large bath towels; Table linen of textile; Tea towels; Terry towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bath robes; Bath slippers; Bathrobes; Kimonos; Robes; Dressing gowns and bath robes; Neckerchieves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OZDILEK EV TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET AS
- Other trademarks owned by OZDILEK EV TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET AS
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VERTICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |