Drawing for KINGROOT

USPTO serial 87249885

KINGROOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTINS, ODETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINGROOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Prakash NAMA

10 CRESTWOOD LANENASHUA, NH 03062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer operating software; Computer search engine software; Computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software for use in database management, use as a spreadsheet, word processing; Downloadable computer software for rooting mobile phones and for getting root access; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, manuals, newsletters in the field of computer technology, entertainment, cultural and sporting events, educational topics, business and general interestACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Computer time-sharing services; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Providing technology information in the field of mobile phone rooting and root access; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in mobile phone rooting and root access, database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing, for searching online databases, for uploading, posting, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or providing of electronic media or information over communications networks or the Internet; Updating, design and rental of softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance