USPTO serial 87250183
RAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Sinnott
TIMOTHY J. SINNOTT BERESKIN & PARR LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L.,S.R.L.40 KING STREET WEST40TH FLOORTORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Virtual reality software for enabling synchronous co-viewing of video and audio media, while allowing for simultaneous communications via text and voice with users on multiple platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |