Drawing for ENLIGHT ASSESS. PROGRESS. SUCCESS.

USPTO serial 87250958

ENLIGHT ASSESS. PROGRESS. SUCCESS.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKEY, ERICA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENLIGHT ASSESS. PROGRESS. SUCCESS.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin F. Segall

KARIN F. SEGALL LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Education software featuring instruction in English language acquisition (ELA), math, science and social studiesACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing on-line assessments in the field of English language acquisition (ELA), math, science and social studies; Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of English language acquisition (ELA), math, science and social studies via an online website; Consulting services in the field of education, namely, consulting services relating to the creation and administration of assessment testsACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to create and administer educational assessments and provide educational assessment results analyticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance