Drawing for Serial No. 87251878

USPTO serial 87251878

Serial No. 87251878

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87251878?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

DAVID A W WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automobiles; land vehicles; Self-driving transport vehicles; transportation and transit shuttle vehicles in the nature of robotic transport vehicles; cargo delivery automobiles and cargo delivery vehicles in the nature of trucksACTIVEMay 24, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 1, 2019GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 1, 2019GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 1, 2019CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2018AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2018IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 23, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 23, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 20, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 20, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 19, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 24, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance