USPTO serial 87256861
WPAY WAPAY WHAT APP PAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WPAY WAPAY WHAT APP PAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing information in the field of insurance; brokerage houses in the field of securities, futures, stocks and bonds; investment of funds for others; consultation in the field of financial analysis and investment in the computer industry; currency exchange services; financial clearinghouses; co-operative credit organizations; holding company services in the nature of investment of funds for others; credit card services; credit bureaus; financial analysis; banking services; capital investment consultation; debt collection and credit agencies; fiduciary representatives; financial services, namely, financing services, loan financing, safe deposit box services; commodity and security exchange price quotations; insurance agency services in the field of health, life, home disability, accident, fire and auto insurance; providing, processing, facilitating, and verifying mobile payments, and contactless financial transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile and wearable devices; processing and administration of mobile payments and contactless financial transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile and wearable devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Providing electronic transmission of credit and debit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network; electronic communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and messages; telephone communication services; radio and television broadcasting services; and providing multiple user access to a global computer information network; transmitting mobile payments and contactless financial transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile and wearable devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |