USPTO serial 87257277
DISCOVER BY CHRONICLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRISCH, HANNA CHO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVER BY CHRONICLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felicia J. Boyd
FELICIA J. BOYD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP225 SOUTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE 2800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4662UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for marketing purposes in the nature of designing advertisements for goods and services, researching pricing trends in the field of general consumer merchandise, evaluating consumer reaction to advertisements and promotions, locating sales of consumer goods that meet user-specific criteria, creating brand awareness by connecting brands and advertisers with social media users, web browsing, corresponding with third parties for the purpose of making transactions, receiving data, and sending data in the fields of financial investments, customer service and sales communication by allowing customers to communicate with customer service representatives via text messaging, reviewing consumer spending data, demographic information, and business productivity data to produce advertising and analyze purchasing trends, estimating and valuing insuring costs, verifying the authenticity of consumer products, obtaining proof of purchase information about consumer products, reporting theft of insured consumer goods, reselling unused consumer goods by creating searchable databases of information relating to consumer goods, operating online marketplaces for leasing of goods and services, coordinating waste recycling services in the nature of scheduling pick up and removal of recycling, facilitating the gifting of consumer products and services from consumer to consumer, transferring files between desktop computers and mobile devices, claiming personal and professional items up for exchange or giveaway by users of the software, and making and accepting offers for the sale of goods and services; Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for browsing the Internet of Things (IOT); Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for reading and writing information from active and passive sensors; Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for use in accessing, reading, tracking, and using blockchain technology; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for syndicating multimedia content to third parties and digital and online electronic communications media networks; Computer application software for use on computers and mobile devices, namely, software for collateralizing goods and services, namely, software for management of financial collateral of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |