USPTO serial 87258861
DBISOLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DBISOLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flexible sound barrier sheets formed of a polymer, asphalt or ethylene copolymer composition for use in the manufacture of wall, floor and ceiling panels; acoustical panels for buildings; sound absorbing flooring underlayment; acoustical insulation for buildings; substances for insulating buildings against moisture including tapes; acoustic underlayment for buildings; insulating tapes for buildings which act as an acoustic barrier; thermoplastic sheets for use in the manufacture of partition walls for use as building materials for acoustical sound and vibration barrier applications; thermoplastic sheets for use in further manufacture of acoustical sound and vibration barriers for automotive applications; acoustical insulation barrier panels for vehicles; plastic acoustical panels for commercial and residential buildings; ethylene copolymer acoustical panels for commercial and residential buildings; asphalt composition acoustical panels for commercial and residential buildings; sound absorbing flooring underlayment of plastic; sound absorbing flooring underlayment of ethylene copolymer; sound absorbing flooring underlayment of asphalt composition; soundproofing materials for commercial and residential buildings; acoustic and thermal insulation of plastic for use in automotive interior components; all of the foregoing made in whole or significant part of plastic; acoustic and thermal insulation for use in automotive interior components made in whole or significant part of ethylene copolymer; acoustic and thermal insulation for use in automotive interior components made in whole or significant part of an asphalt composition | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Plastic reinforced wall and ceiling panels for use as sound barriers; plastic reinforced wall panels for use as sound barriers composed of plastic polymer compositions; non-metal, reinforced wall, floor and ceiling panels for use as sound barriers composed of ethylene copolymer compositions; non-metal, reinforced wall, floor and ceiling panels for use as sound barriers composed of asphalt compositions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United Plastics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by United Plastics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named DBISOLATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |