USPTO serial 87258877
FRESNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2021
- Examiner
- SMITH,CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FRESNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Kent
Julie A. Kent Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE RELATING TO ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; SOFTWARE, NAMELY, DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR ANALYTICS AND USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS INVOLVING THE DESIGN OR INSTALLATION OF DISPERSED GEOSPATIAL ASSETS WITH COMPLEX STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS IN A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER ENVIRONMENT, WHERE SCHEDULING INCLUDES MULTIPLE TASK AND ACTIVITIES WITH INTERDEPENDENCIES; SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR REVIEWING, TRACKING, MEASURING AND MANAGING ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, PERMITTING, SCHEDULES, PAYABLES AND RECEIVABLES | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2017 |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS); DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FEATURING DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE RELATING TO ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FEATURING DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR ANALYTICS AND USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS INVOLVING THE DESIGN OR INSTALLATION OF DISPERSED GEOSPATIAL ASSETS WITH COMPLEX STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS IN A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER ENVIRONMENT, WHERE SCHEDULING INCLUDES MULTIPLE TASK AND ACTIVITIES WITH INTERDEPENDENCIES; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR REVIEWING, TRACKING, MEASURING AND MANAGING ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, PERMITTING, SCHEDULES, PAYABLES AND RECEIVABLES; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND EDITING DESIGNS, MANAGING MATERIALS, RECORDING PROGRESS, MONITORING SCHEDULES, AND REPORTING PERFORMANCE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, REMOTE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF IN-HOUSE AND HOSTED DATACENTER DEVICES, DATABASES AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING IN THE NATURE OF DIAGNOSING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; UPDATING AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fresnel Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fresnel Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fresnel Software Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRESNEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |