Drawing for SPARX

USPTO serial 87258884

SPARX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrell R. Miller

Teresa J. Lechner-Fish FOLEY & LARDNER LLP1000 Louisiana St., Suite 2000Houston, TX 77002-2099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Circuit boards, namely, electrical and printed circuit boards for use in the fields of industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipment; Electrical controllers for use in the fields of industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipment, excluding electrical controllers for application in manufacturing and controlling processes as applied to thin film industry; Housings, namely, circuit board, electrical connector and electric switch housingsACTIVEDec 31, 2010
035Providing business consulting services for production management of manufactured products in the fields of consumer electronics, industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipmentACTIVEDec 31, 2010
040Chemical processing services in the fields of chemical analytics, molecular-based sensors such as supramolecular, polymeric, dyes, fluorescence, chemiluminescent and electrochemical sensors, chemical synthesis and optimization, neural networks, and differential chemical sensing with sensor arrays; Prototype fabrication services of new products for others; 3D printing servicesACTIVEDec 31, 2010
042Chemical synthesis consulting services; Custom design and development services for chemical compounds; Development and test services for chemical production methods; Electronic and electrical system design services in the fields of industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipment; Engineering design services in the fields of industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipment; Scientific development services in the fields of chemical analytics, molecular modeling, molecular formulations, neural networks, nonlinear analysis and molecular-based sensors; Mechanical engineering services in the fields of industrial control systems, medical devices, chemical analytics, and automated test equipment; Technological consulting services in the fields of engineering and materials science, space flight hardware, chemical analytics, chemical synthesis, and biomedical researchACTIVEDec 31, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 20, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 12, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 24, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Aug 5, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance