USPTO serial 87259587
THE PATIO EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PATIO EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
MARIA JOHNSON DE NOVO LEGAL, PC2055 CORTE DEL NOGALCARLSBAD, CA 92011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of salads, in the nature of tuna salad, chicken salad, potato salad, garden salad, Caesar salad, cobb salad, Mediterranean vegetable salad, kale salad, beet salad; Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of processed fruit, yogurt dip parfait in the nature of a dip, processed veggies, hummus, cheese; Prepared foods and prepackaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of processed fruit and cracker combinations, egg, cheese, sliced vegetable crudité, hummus parfait in the nature of a dip, and sides in the nature of pickles; Grocery products, namely, cooked fruits and vegetables, potato chips, jams, jellies, marmalades; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of salads, in the nature of tuna salad, chicken salad, potato salad, garden salad, Caesar salad, cobb salad, Mediterranean vegetable salad, kale salad, beet salad; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of processed fruit, yogurt dip parfait in the nature of a dip, processed veggies, hummus, cheese, processed fruit and cracker combinations, egg, cheese, sliced vegetable crudité, hummus parfait in the nature of a dip, and sides in the nature of pickles; Prepared meals, foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of coleslaw salad; Drinks and beverages, namely, fruit-based food beverage, yogurt drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of salads in the nature of quinoa salad, noodle salad, Fattoush salad; Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, desserts in the nature of pies, cakes, and bakery desserts; Meals, namely, noodle-based prepared meals, frozen meals consisting primarily of quinoa; Grocery products, namely, applesauce, corn bread, candy, breads, sauces, condiments, in the nature of chili pepper paste, prepared horseradish; Drinks and beverages, namely, espresso drinks, ice cream drinks; Prepared meals to go primarily comprised of salads, namely, quinoa salad, noodle salad, desserts, namely, pies, cakes, bakery desserts; Prepared foods, packaged foods for retail sale, and prepared meals to go namely, granola berry parfait, and fruit and yogurt parfait | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Drinks and beverages, namely, beer | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Drinks and beverages, namely, wine, prepared alcoholic cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Patio Express, LP
- Other trademarks owned by The Patio Express, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named THE PATIO EXPRESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |