Drawing for SWINDLERS RIDGE DISTILLERY

USPTO serial 87260065

SWINDLERS RIDGE DISTILLERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWINDLERS RIDGE DISTILLERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony M. Verna III

ANTHONY M. VERNA III VERNA LAW, P.C.80 THEODORE FREMD AVE.RYE, NY 10580UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Vodka, gin, whiskey, bourbon, alcoholic bitters, liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 1, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 31, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 1, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance