USPTO serial 87260138
CHAIPARATHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHAIPARATHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.STE 4000200 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, mixtures of coffee and chicory; instant coffee; coffee beans; ground coffee; coffee substitutes; beverages consisting principally of coffee; beverages made from coffee; beverages with coffee base; coffee essences; coffee extracts; decaffeinated coffee; flavoured coffee; freeze-dried coffee; ice beverages with a coffee base; malt coffee and malt coffee extracts; drinking chocolate and cocoa; tea and herbal tea; beverages with a tea base; sugar; rice; flour; bread; naan bread; bread based snack foods; cakes; prepared meals consisting of pasta; biscuits; chocolate and confectionery made of sugar; ice creams and sorbets; sauces and spices; salad dressings and mayonnaise; condiments, namely, ketchup, mustard, relish, chutneys; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; patisserie; pastries; Danish pastries; baguettes; panini; breakfast cereals; sandwiches; pizzas, pies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order retail services, online retail and whole sale store services in the field of food and food products, coffee, mixtures of coffee and chicory, coffee products consisting of or containing coffee, instant coffee, coffee beans, ground coffee, coffee substitutes, beverages consisting principally of coffee, beverages made from coffee, beverages with coffee base, coffee essences, coffee extracts, decaffeinated coffee, flavoured coffee, freeze-dried coffee, ice beverages with a coffee base, malt coffee and malt coffee extracts, drinking chocolate and cocoa, water, fruit drinks and juices, alcoholic beverages, beer, wine, spirits, sugar, rice, flour, bread, naan bread, snack foods and snack food products, cakes, pasta, biscuits, chocolate and confectionery, ice creams and sorbets, sauces and spices, salad dressings and mayonnaise, condiments, frozen foodstuffs, prepared meals, patisserie, patisserie food products, pastries and pastry products, Danish pastries, baguettes, panini, cereals, sandwiches, pizzas and pies and pasta dishes; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to all of the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |