USPTO serial 87260710
BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, QUEBEC, CA
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie Webb Olson
Carrie Webb Olson Day Pitney LLPOne International Place, 17th FloorBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Kitchen appliances, namely, electric food blenders, electric stand mixers, electric handheld mixers, electric egg or dough beaters, electric egg slicing machines, electric food slicers, electric food processors, electric food grinders, electric hand-held grinders, electric food choppers, electric food peelers, food and beverage mixers; electric spice grinders, electric meat slicers, electric food beaters, electrically powered kitchen appliances for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food, electric fruit squeezers, electric hand-held mixers for household purposes, electric fruit squeezers for household purposes, grating machines for vegetables, machines for making pasta, meat slicing machines, sausage making machines, power-operated flour mills for household purposes, electric pepper mills, electric blenders for making milkshakes, electric juice extractors, electric juicers, non-aerated beverage making electrical appliances, electric blenders for making margaritas, aerated beverage-making machines, electric coffee grinders, milk filtering machines, dairy machines, namely, electric milk dispensers and electric cream dispensers, electric hand-held milk frothers, machines for making soda pop, electric knives, electric knife sharpeners, electric knife sharpening machines, electric can openers, electric vacuum bag sealers, blades for electric food processors, electric crushers for household purposes, electric ice crushers, electrical apparatus for sealing plastic packaging, electric bag sealers for use with food, and dishwashers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |