Drawing for AMOUR PROPRE

USPTO serial 87260799

AMOUR PROPRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMOUR PROPRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Enshan Hong

ENSHAN HONG VLP LAW GROUP LLP555 BYRANT STREET, SUITE 820PALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Imaging, display, and communication system comprised of a flat panel display screen, a RGB color camera, and a 3D scanning depth sensor that can function in mirror mode or display mode, and that can be partitioned and operate simultaneously in both mirror mode and display mode, and that may also operate as a RGB color camera or a 3D scanning depth with embedded software for image processing, managing, organizing, comparing, transmitting, editing and displaying photos and also with embedded user interface software; mobile applications for use with the imaging, display, and communication system for aggregating, accessing, providing, creating, managing or sharing information and other digital content in the fields of fashion or shopping, or for enabling brand owners or retailers to connect with their patrons, or for capturing and processing two-dimensional images, videos, or schematics for three-dimensional objects for user interaction input, analysis and visual output, or for capturing user's voice commands, gestures or touch as user interaction inputACTIVE—
020Furniture; mirrorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance