USPTO serial 87260863
TEKFILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2017
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TEKFILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CASTELLI CALEPIO (BG), IT
MILANO (MI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie N. Nikitenko
Stephanie N. Nikitenko IpHorgan Ltd195 Arlington Heights Road, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Unprocessed plastics ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Semi-worked plastics, namely, high performance skived and extruded technopolymer films and sheets, namely, non epoxy-based fluoropolymer plastic films and sheets for industrial and commercial use; Semi-processed plastics, namely, high performance technopolymer films and sheets used to cover other materials with the aim of providing other materials with non-stick, high temperature and chemical resistance, antifriction, sealing, release properties, and electrical and thermal insulation; technopolymer films and sheets * ; all of the foregoing * not intended for packaging use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |