Drawing for Serial No. 87261073

USPTO serial 87261073

Serial No. 87261073

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87261073?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Shapiro

Joseph Shapiro STRONG & HANNI102 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle accessories, namely, fitted seat covers, bumpers, steering wheel covers, auto aftermarket accessories, namely, vehicle grillesACTIVE—
027Floor mats for vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 15, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 17, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 9, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 9, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance