Drawing for COCTEAL

USPTO serial 87261340

COCTEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCTEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Venus Griffith Trunnel

Venus Griffith Trunnel Attorney at LawP.O. Box 4551Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic tea-based beverageACTIVEJun 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2020PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 26, 2020PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 16, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2019CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 26, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 26, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 22, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance