USPTO serial 87262117
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq.
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller Plaza, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive multimedia telecommunication devices and apparatus for digital presentations and teleconferencing comprised of computer hardware and software therefor sold together as a unit; Interactive multimedia telecommunication devices and apparatus for use in classes, seminars and meetings comprised of computer hardware and software therefor sold together as a unit; Interactive multimedia telecommunication devices and apparatus for transmitting, delivering, receiving and sharing sound, image and video files comprised of computer hardware and software therefor sold together as a unit; computer programs used for giving digital presentations and teleconferencing; computer programs for interactive multimedia presentations; computer programs used for transmitting, delivering, receiving and sharing sound, image and video files; tablet computers; computers; smartphones; apparatus for transmission of communication; transmitting and receiving apparatus for long-distance transmission of sound, images, video and communication; Transmitting and receiving apparatus for sound, images and video for use in classes, seminars and meetings, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunication network and telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communication protocols; Computer peripheral equipment for input, output, transmission and storage of data; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; telecommunication hardware and software for interactive multimedia communication; other telecommunication devices and apparatus; remote communication system, namely, electronic communication systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between multiple points; computer software for downloading, managing, processing and reproducing of sound, movie, documents, images and pictures; computer software for interactive multimedia communication; computer software in the field of education; computer software for wireless content delivery and synchronization of multimedia among computer, television, smartphones, tablet computers and other display units; computer programs for communication, discussion and learning; other computer programs, namely, computer programs for wired content delivery and synchronization of multimedia among computers, televisions, smartphones, tablet computers, optical disc players, video cameras, LCD large-screen displays, projection screens and multimedia projectors; all not to be advertised and sold in the field of manufacturing and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | network conference services; telecommunication access services; providing electronic telecommunication connections; digital network telecommunication services; transmission of sound, picture and data by electronic computer terminals; transmission of sound, picture and data by electronic communications networks; telecommunications services, namely, namely, telecommunication gateway services; all not to be advertised and sold in the field of manufacturing and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | cloud computing services, namely, server hosting; cloud computing featuring software for interactive multimedia communication; computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for wireless content delivery and synchronization of multimedia among computer, television, smartphones, tablet computers and other display units; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; development and creation of computer programs for communication, discussion and learning; design and development of software and hardware for processing and distribution of multimedia contents; design and development of software and hardware for multimedia data storing and recalling; computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; providing non-downloadable computer programs in the field of education; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs for communication, discussion and learning on data networks; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs for multimedia data storing and recalling; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs on data networks; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs for wireless content delivery and synchronization of multimedia among computer, television, smartphones, tablet computers and other display units; all not to be advertised and sold in the field of manufacturing and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |