Drawing for LA SENZA BEYOND SEXY

USPTO serial 87262140

LA SENZA BEYOND SEXY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA SENZA BEYOND SEXY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Davis

David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body cream; Body lotion; Body sprays; Body wash; Eau de toilette; Fragrances for personal use; Perfume, excluding hair and scalp preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 1, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance