USPTO serial 87263971
DOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2018
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with DOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Des Plaines, IL
Des Plaines, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hemavathy Perumal
Hemavathy Perumal SHERMAN IP LLP15760 Ventura Blvd.Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Camera filters; Camera flashes; Digital cameras; Digital cellular phones; Lenses for cameras; Lenses for photographic apparatus; Camera mounts and supports; Mobile device mounts and supports; Cellular phone mounts and supports; Lens adapters for digital cameras; Lens adapters for mobile device cameras; Lens adapters for cellular phone cameras; Mobile device mounts and supports; Cellular phone mounts and supports | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |