CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SIMPLYTHRIVE

USPTO serial 87264336

SIMPLYTHRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLYTHRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Homyk

MATTHEW A. HOMYK BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring apparel, footwear, bags, leather goods, jewelry, watches, toiletries, fragrances and eyewearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Apr 9, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 8, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance