Drawing for YUENJOY

USPTO serial 87264471

YUENJOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YUENJOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Backpacks; Bags for sports; Briefcases; Clutch bags; Coin purses; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Drawstring bags; Evening bags; Gentlemen's handbags; Handbag frames; Handbags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather and imitation leather bags; Pocket wallets; Purses and wallets; School book bags; Shoulder bags; Travelling bags; Wristlet bags; Reusable shopping bagsABANDONEDSep 26, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 28, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 16, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance