Drawing for MODERN FITNESS

USPTO serial 87264548

MODERN FITNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODERN FITNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy K Kroninger

TIMOTHY K KRONINGER VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP160 WEST FORT STREET, FIFTH FLOORDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements; Protein supplements; Whey protein supplements; Vitamin supplements; Dietary supplements; Nutritional, protein, vitamin, and dietary supplements; Nutritional, protein, vitamin, and dietary supplements for mixing with water and other beverages; and Nutritional, protein, vitamin, and dietary supplements to be added to beveragesACTIVE—
035On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring nutritional, protein, vitamin, and dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 14, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance