Drawing for NAUTIGIRL WINE MOJITO FRESH & FIZZY ALL NATURAL FLAVORS NAUTIGIRL NG WINE MOJITO

USPTO serial 87265133

NAUTIGIRL WINE MOJITO FRESH & FIZZY ALL NATURAL FLAVORS NAUTIGIRL NG WINE MOJITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NAUTIGIRL WINE MOJITO FRESH & FIZZY ALL NATURAL FLAVORS NAUTIGIRL NG WINE MOJITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristen Mollnow Walsh

KRISTEN MOLLNOW WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLP1300 CLINTON SQUAREROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 8, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance