CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FARMYARD

USPTO serial 87265548

FARMYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARMYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frances M Jagla

Frances M Jagla Lane Powell PC601 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 2100Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, non-alcoholic ciderACTIVE—
033Wine, hard cider, and spirits, excluding beerACTIVE—
035Farmers' marketsACTIVE—
036Real estate agency servicesACTIVE—
041Organizing community festivals featuring primarily music, sporting events, art exhibitions, arts and craft displays and sales, wine tasting, and also providing farmers' marketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 12, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance