USPTO serial 87265612
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edinburgh EH12 7AX, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. SCOTT ALPRIN ALPRIN LAW OFFICES, P.C.5 PINEHURST CIRCLE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20015UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Rental of apparatus for the recording of video signals, namely, portable videography booths for taking of videos; Rental of cinematographic machines and apparatus, namely, portable photography booths for taking of pictures; Rental of cameras; Rental of video cameras; Rental of video screens; Digital video, audio and multimedia entertainment publishing services; Organising of sporting events, namely, community sporting events; Organising of recreational events, namely, providing photographic computer imaging services for recreational purposes; Organising events for cultural purposes; Organising events for entertainment purposes, namely, arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Rental of computer hardware and facilities; Computer software rental; Rental of computers and software; Software consultancy services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |