Drawing for LUDI

USPTO serial 87266068

LUDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LUDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tommy SF Wang

TOMMY SF WANG WANG IP LAW GROUP, P.C.18645 E. GALE AVE.#205CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Structural parts for automobilesACTIVESep 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 17, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 20, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 20, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 18, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance