USPTO serial 87266381
PERFORMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven N. Terranova
STEVEN N. TERRANOVA WITHROW + TERRANOVA, PLLC106 PINEDALE SPRINGS WAYCARY, NC 27511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Plastic foam in extruded form, in the form of sheets, and in the form of blocks for use in further manufacture; Olefinic elastomeric foam in extruded form, in the form of sheets, and in the form of blocks for use in further manufacture; Foam comprising olefinic and olefinic elastomeric resins to include low density polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, chlorinated polyethylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, styrene block copolymers, polyurethane, and thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPV's) in extruded form, in the form of sheets, and in the form of blocks for use in further manufacture; Foam for use in the manufacture of floor and wall mats and padding; Plastics in extruded form for use in the further manufacture of items that provide protection against collision; Flexible foamed plastics in extruded form, in the form of sheets, and in the form of blocks for use in further manufacture; Flexible foamed sheets for use in further manufacture; Flexible foamed plastics in the form of foams and films, and sheets for use in the manufacture of gym mats, wrestling mats, landing mats, easy roll mats, folding mats, yoga mats, stadium and sports arena protective floor padding, stage mats, garage/parking padding for use in further manufacture, and flexible foamed plastics in extruded form, in the form of sheets, and in the form of blocks for use in further manufacture; Flexible foamed plastics in the form of thermoplastic elastomeric foams and films, and sheets for use in the manufacture of gym mats, wrestling mats, landing mats, easy roll mats, folding mats, yoga mats, stadium and sports arena protective floor padding, stage mats, and garage/parking padding for use in further manufacture; Flexible foamed olefinic plastics in the form of foams and films, and sheets for use in the manufacture of gym mats, wrestling mats, landing mats, easy roll mats, folding mats, yoga mats, stadium and sports arena protective floor padding, stage mats, and garage/parking padding for use in further manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor mats; Floor mats manufactured out of olefinic and olefinic elastomeric resins to include low density polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, chlorinated polyethylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, styrene block copolymers, polyurethane, thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPV's); Gym mats; Gymnastic wall mats; Wrestling mats; Yoga mats; Stadium and sports arena protective padding, namely, floor and wall coverings of foam plastic; Floor and wall coverings, namely, protective floor and wall mats and padding, namely floor and wall coverings of foam plastic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |