USPTO serial 87266851
CROWN NUT CO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROWN NUT CO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina N. Rubke
CRISTINA N RUBKE SHARTSIS FRIESE LLPONE MARITIME PLAZA18TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | almond-based snack foods; snack foods, namely, roasted almonds and seasoned almonds; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed almonds; processed almonds | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |