USPTO serial 87267344
DY N FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DY N FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Troy, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Burzych
Mark J. Burzych Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC4151 Okemos RoadOkemos, MI 48864UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair lotions; Hair oils; Hair spray; Hair care lotions; Shampoos; Shaving cream; After-shave creams; Hair conditioners; Hair pomades; Hair rinses; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair wax; Mustache wax | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs; Hair brushes; Shaving brush holders; Shaving brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Barrettes; Hair clips; Hair extensions; Hair accessories, namely, hair ties, scrunchies and head bands; Ponytail holders and hair ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |