USPTO serial 87267788
CARFIT PULS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARFIT PULS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PORTLAND, OR
PORTLAND, OR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for automotives, namely, for vehicle data analysis; authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers and computer networks; integrated circuit chips for use in financial applications designed for impregnation into automotives | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design; Computer software development in the field of digital signal processing; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of software and hardware for digital signal processing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |