Drawing for AUN

USPTO serial 87267804

AUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samen chen

P.O. BOX 2409,SUZHOU CITYJIANGSU PROVINCE, 215028CHINA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
0093D spectacles; Audio-receivers and video-receivers; Cabinets for loudspeakers; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Data processing equipment, namely, couplers; Downloadable middleware for software application integration; Frames for photographic transparencies; Head-mounted video displays; Headphones; Photographic cameras; Portable media players; Projection screens; Projection screens for movie films; Set-top boxes; Slide projectors; Smartwatches; Television sets; Transparency projection apparatus; Virtual reality game software; Wearable computer peripherals; Wireless receivers and transmitters for portable media playersACTIVESep 12, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2020MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 18, 2020ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 2, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2017ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance