Drawing for 1 USA

USPTO serial 87268855

1 USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CERDA, VICTOR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1 USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sevag Demirjian

SEVAG DEMIRJIAN DEMIRJIAN LAW OFFICES5200 LANKERSHIM BLVD SUITE 850NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Broadcasting of Television shows, news and entertainment programs; Cable television broadcasting; Cable television transmission; Television broadcasting; Satellite television broadcasting; Subscription television broadcastingACTIVEJan 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 17, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 14, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 16, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 11, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 11, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance